[2026:RJ-JP:2413] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1007/2026 1. Jabbar Deen S/o Allabaksh, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Dariy Colony, Ward No. 12, Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana, Registered Owner Of Truck Bearing No. HR-55-AS-7645 2. Ganesh Singh Jakhar S/o Heera Ram, R/o Ward No. 6, Amritwasi Road, Indpalsar Hirawatan, Bikaner, Rajasthan, Registered Owner Of Truck Bearing No. RJ-07-GD-7232 3. Nabab Khan S/o Fheju Khan, R/o Vpo Shimla, Tehsil Sar- darshahar, District Churu, Rajasthan, Registered Owner Of Truck Bearing No. RJ-10-GC-7075 4. Mohd. Jahul S/o Fajruddin, R/o House No. 15, Alwar Road, Nbgsm College, Ward No. 12, Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana, Registered Owner Of Truck Bearing No. HR-55- AP-9322 ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Joint Secretary, Mines And Geology Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 3. Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. Regional Transport Officer, Bikaner, District Bikaner. 5. District Transport Officer, Sujangarh, District Churu. 6. District Transport Officer, Didwana, District Didwana Kuchaman. 7. District Transport Officer, Nokha, District Bikaner. 8. Regional Transport Officer, Alwar, District Alwar. 9. Regional Transport Officer, Bharatpur, District Bharatpur. 10. Regional Transport Officer, Jaipur First, District Jaipur. 11. District Transport Officer, Kotputli, District Kotputli-Behror. 12. District Transport Officer, Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu. 13. Regional Transport Officer, Sikar, District Sikar. ----Respondents [2026:RJ-JP:2413] (2 of 3) [CW-1007/2026] For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Rajani Vyas For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore, AAAG on behalf of Mr. S. S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 20/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for both the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in the present matter is squarely covered by the judgments passed by the Co-ordinate Benches of this Court in the matters of Kanwar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.1 and Mustak & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.2 2. In view of the consensus arrived at between the parties, since there is serious dispute about the service of notice prior to suspension of registration certificates, as the petitioners deny the services, whereas the respondents claim due service of notice. Be that as it may, while keeping the said issue open, with the consent of the parties, the suspensions are set aside, as the said vehicle is the source of bread and butter for the petitioners and their fam- ilies. 3. However, the aforementioned setting aside/revocation shall only be effective subject to the condition that the petitioners will produce their vehicle before the Transport Department, who will examine and inspect the vehicles' make and design; and in case any mechanical alteration or overloading is found, a detailed inventory shall be prepared and appropriate orders shall be passed strictly in accordance with law. 1S.B. C.W.P. No.9721/2025 2S.B. C.W.P. No.20073/2025 [2026:RJ-JP:2413] (3 of 3) [CW-1007/2026] 4. This arrangement shall be valid only for carrying the vehicles to the respective office of DTO for the aforesaid verification/ inspection and shall not authorize the vehicle to ply on the road for any other purpose. 5. The petitioners, along with their vehicle concerned, shall report to/ before the respective DTO who passed the order of suspension of registration of the subject vehicle, on 03.02.2026, preferably between 11:00 A.M. to 01:00 P.M. Thereafter, due reply shall be filed within a period of 15 days by the petitioners. 6. Audience with respect to the same will be provided by the competent authority on 17.02.2026. Adjudication of the same shall be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days. 7. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of. 8. Any other pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/51