1 of 2 07-FA.478.2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 7 FIRST APPEAL NO. 478 OF 2009 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VERSUS SHESHANABAI BAJIRAO CHAVAN ... Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for the Appellant/State. Mr. Santosh T. Ghute, Advocate for the Respondent is Absent. ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 1st OCTOBER, 2026 P.C.:- 1. Since the acquisition proceedings pertain to the year 1990, the appeal is heard finally with the consent of the learned Advocates for the respective parties. 2. By this appeal, the Appellant/State is aggrieved by the Judgment and award dated 08.06.2004 passed by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division at Osmanabad in L.A.R. No.428/1994. 3. Both the learned Advocates for the respective parties submit that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the SLAO. 4. In fact the State Government vide Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, 2026:BHC-AUG:46627 2 of 2 07-FA.478.2009 if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 5. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned order. Hence, the present Appeal is dismissed. 6. In view of dismissal of the Appeal, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) Tauseef