Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1601 (KAR)

SATHYANANDA v. D.K.VARTHAKARA VIVIDHODHODHESHA

WP/6643/2026 · 2026-04-08

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19176 WP No. 6643 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.6643 OF 2026 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SATHYANANDA S/O NARAYANA DAS, AGED 57 YEARS, R/AT SHRI LAKSHMI NIVAS, MURA, KABAKA POST, PUTTUR TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT-574201. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRASANNA V.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. D. K. VARTHAKARA VIVIDHODHODHESHA SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITHA BANTWAL, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER RI.AJITH KUMAR JAIN BANTWAL, BANTWAL TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT-574219. 2. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES D.K.DISTRICT, MANGALURU-575001. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19176 WP No. 6643 of 2026 3. SHARATH KUMAR S/O RAGHUDAS AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/AT DOOR NO.4-313, KUDOOR HOUSE, VITLA POST, BANTWAL TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT-574243. 4. SUBRAMANAYA PRASAD S/O RAGHUDAS AGE : MAJOR R/AT DOOR NO.4-313, KUDOOR HOUSE, VITLA POST, BANTWAL TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT-574243. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H.K. KENCHEGOWDA, AGA FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 31.10.2025 ON IA. NO.1 IN DISPUTE NO.JRM/DDS/179/2024-25 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 DYRCS, REJECTING THE SAID APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER SEEKING TO TRANSFER THE PROCEEDING TO ANY OTHER FORUM HAVING COMPETENT JURISDICTION, VIDE ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19176 WP No. 6643 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. Keeping open all the contentions raised in this Writ Petition to be urged before the competent authority, if so advised, the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 2 Sl No.: 21