Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16008 (AP)

SHAIK CHAN BEGUM v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/783/2023 · 2026-01-04

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010047462023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 783/2023 Between: 1. SHAIK CHAN BEGUM, W/O.KHALESHA, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.4/456-B, GADDIVEEDHI, RAJAMPET TOWN, RAJAMPET MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, A.P 2. SHAIK NOOR MOHAMMED,, S/O.KHALESHA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.4/456-B, GADDIVEEDHI, RAJAMPET TOWN, RAJAMPET MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, A.P ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, NELAPADU, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. FARHANA, W/O.SHAIK AHMAD AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O.ARAVAPALLI NAGIREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, NANDALUR MANDAL ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, A.P- 516150 ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtpleased to quash the C.C. No. 220/2020 on the file of Hon'ble Junior Civil Judge, Rajampet, for the offences under Sections 498-A, 354, 506 r/w. Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, against the Petitioners/Accused No's.1 and 3 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 2 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay of all further proceedings in C.C. No. 220/2020 on the file of Hon'ble Junior Civil Judge, Rajampet, for the offences under Sections 498-A, 354, 506 r/w.Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, against the Petitioners/Accused No's.1 and 3 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. N SAI PHANINDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. TURAGA SAI SURYA The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 783/2023 ORDER: None represented on behalf of the petitioners. 2. Ms. K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter since the matter ended in acquittal before the Trial Court and petition may be disposed of. 3. In that view of the matter, this Criminal Petition is dismissed, since relief has become infructuous. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.01.2026. UPS