Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16007 (RAJ)

DHARMESHWAR @ GOLU S/O SHRI GOVIND SHARMA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1286/2026 · 2026-02-04

Sandeep Taneja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:5283] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1286/2026 Dharmeshwar @ Golu S/o Shri Govind Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o House No. 123/136, Agarwal Farm, Police Station Shipra Path, District Jaipur, Rajasthan State. (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Varendra Kumar Bakshi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 04/02/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.19/2025 registered at Police Station Patrakar Colony, District Jaipur City (South) for offence(s) under Section(s) 305(a) and 331(4) of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate, the petitioner is in custody since 02.11.2025 and no recovery is required to be made from the petitioner. Learned counsel also submits that the conclusion of investigation and trial will take considerable time, he, therefore, prays to enlarge the petitioner on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:5283] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1286/2026] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that petitioner has two criminal antecedents, however, the same are not of similar nature. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as also after perusal of the case diary, particularly the fact that the offences are triable by Magistrate, and the fact that the conclusion of trial is going to take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused- petitioner Dharmeshwar @ Golu S/o Shri Govind Sharma is ordered to be released on bail, provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J TN/132