SUJIT KUMAR ALIAS SUJIT KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4348/2026 · 2026-06-09
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16007 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16007 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
{ 2026:JHHC:16677} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.4348 of 2026
------ Sujit Kumar @ Sujit Kumar Yadav, Aged 26 years, S/O- Vijay Rai, R/o- Om Nagar, Dhawan Nagar, Kanke Road, P.O.- Ranchi University, P.S.- Gonda, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand.
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand.
… Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhanu Kumar No.1, Advocate.
Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocate. For the State
: Mr. Bishwambhar Shastri, A.P.P.
------
Order No:-02 Dated:-09-06-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of bail in connection with Gonda P.S. Case No.08 of 2026(N) registered for the offences punishable under sections 21(b)/22/29 of the NDPS Act and under Section 111(2)(b)/111(3) of the BNS, 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons were involved in sale of brown sugar and 24.3 grams of brown sugar which is commonly known as heroin, was recovered from their possession out of which 06.63 grams of brown sugar was recovered from the petitioner. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the brown sugar seized is of intermediate quantity. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.01.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the co-accused person has already been admitted to bail by a coordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 17.03.2026 in B.A. No. 2047 of 2026. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not indulge in any offence while on bail. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Commissioner at Ranchi, in connection with Gonda P.S. Case No.08 of 2026(N) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
09/06/2026 Amar/