Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1600 (UTT)

YOGITA PANDEY v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/453/2025 · 2026-02-09

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:705 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS ABA/453/2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Amit Kapri, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, learned AGA with Ms. Shweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, learned counsel for the complainant. 4. Applicant was granted interim bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court on 02.05.2025. 5. Learned State Counsel has apprised to this Court that charge sheet has already been filed and trial has already been commenced and evidence is going on. 6. Deceased was husband of the applicant and as per allegations, deceased was put to harassment by the applicant and commit suicide and now, the applicant is facing the trial for the offence punishable under Section 306 IPC in Criminal Case No. 415 of 2024 (State of Uttarakhand Vs. Yogita Pandey) pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Khatima. 7. Be that as it may, interim bail was granted and the trial is at the stage of evidence. In such an eventuality, present anticipatory bail application is disposed of finally by making interim order dated 02.05.2025 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court as absolute and simultaneously, the trial court is also directed to expedite and conclude the trial within 9 months without giving any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. Prosecution is also directed to make all possible efforts in expediting the trial within the aforesaid period. 8. Subject to the observation and directions, as above, the instant anticipatory bail application is disposed of finally. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 09.02.2026 SKS