GANPAT PRAJAPAT S/O MR. GOPAL PRAJAPAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1022/2026 · 2026-01-28
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15997 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15997 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3835] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1022/2026 Ganpat Prajapat S/o Mr. Gopal Prajapat, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Sangram Garh, Police Station Badnaur, Distt Beawar And Currently Resident Of (Tenant) Krishi Vihar Colony, Land Mark Building, Police Station Narayan Vihar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naresh Chandra Goyal Mr. Tanmay Goyal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 28/01/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.656/2025 registered at Police Station Mahesh Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) for offences under Sections 8 and 21 of NDPS Act, 1985.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner is a young man aged 25 years. The allegation against the present petitioner pertains to the recovery of 9.45 gm of contraband (MD), which is below the commercial quantity. Petitioner is behind the bars since 14.12.2025 without any criminal past. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be
[2026:RJ-JP:3835] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1022/2026] served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Ganpat Prajapat S/o Mr. Gopal Prajapat, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/153