Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010375722026 + W.P.(CRL) 2450/2026
JEESHAN
.....Petitioner Through: Mohd. Zubair, Mr. Chetan, Advocates with petitioner in person
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand V. Khatri, ASC with SI KV Singh
Ms. Niru Pana Pradhan, Ms. Gaytri Bhardwaj, Ms. Anjali and Ms. Sarika, Advocates for R-2 & 3 wit R-2 & 3 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R %
14.08.2026
1. By virtue of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.79/2025 dated 10.03.2025 registered at PS.: Preet Vihar, Delhi under Sections 281/125(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and all proceedings emanating therefrom as the petitioner and respondent nos.2 and 3 have mutually settled all their disputes vide Settlement Deed dated 11.05.2026 before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi.
2. Issue notice.
3. Learned ASC for the State accepts notice and submits that he has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2026 at 11:58:15
4.
Learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 and 3 also accepts notice and submits that the respondent nos.2 and 3 have no objection if the present petition is allowed. 5. This Court has further had the occasion of interacting with the petitioner as well as the respondent nos.2 and 3, who all are present in Court. They affirm the terms of the aforesaid Settlement Deed dated 11.05.2026, wherein it is recorded that the petitioner has already paid the respondent nos.2 and 3 a total sum of Rs.8,000/- as full and final settlement of all their present, past and future claims and as such, the parties have agreed to put a quietus to their disputes. Respondent nos.2 and 3 hence submit that they do not wish to continue with the aforesaid FIR against the petitioner. 6. The petitioner and the respondent nos.2 and 3, present in Court, as well as their credentials, as on record, have been duly identified by the IO. 7. As noted above, a settlement based on mutual terms between the petitioner and the respondent nos.2 and 3 is the basis of filing the present petition, which is accompanied by their respective affidavit(s) qua the said effect. In view thereof, the present is a fit case for quashing the aforesaid FIR. Accordingly, as also following the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs. Babita Raguvanshi & Anr.: (2013) 4 SCC 58, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2014) 6 SCC 466, and also since there is nothing left to corroborate and prove the case of the prosecution, continuation of the present FIR will be an exercise in futility. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2026 at 11:58:15
8. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.79/2025 dated 10.03.2025 registered at PS.: Preet Vihar, Delhi under Sections 281/125(a) of the BNS and all proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. 9. As such, the present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. SAURABH BANERJEE, J.
AUGUST 14, 2026/So This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2026 at 11:58:15