HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7511 of 2015 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This is plaintiff's petition. The application for grant of temporary injunction has been refused by both courts below. 2. After hearing learned counsel for petitioner and perusing the material on record, I find that no case for interference is made out. 3. The petition is misconceived and stands dismissed. 4. However, in case, any application is moved before court below for expediting the suit proceeding in light of judgement of Constitution Bench of Hon'ble Apex Court rendered in case of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others (2024) 6 SCC 267, the court below shall consider the decide the same, expeditiously. October 8, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kartikeya Saran Counsel for Respondent(s) : , Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari, Rajesh Maurya (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Bal Chandra Rai .....Petitioner(s) Arun Kumar Singh .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad