Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15992 (KAR)

M VENUGOPAL v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/19608/2021 · 2026-02-23

M G S Kamal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11025 WP No. 19608 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 19608 OF 2021 (GM-BWSSB) BETWEEN: M VENUGOPAL S/O MUNIYAPPA REDDY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT PLOT NO.89, 16TH D MAIN, HAL II STAGE BENGALURU-560 008. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAHUL S REDDY.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE CHARIMAN BWSSB CAUVERY BHAVAN, K G ROAD BENGALURU-560 001. 3. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF ENGINEER (M)-1 BWSSB, CAUVERY BHAVAN, K G ROAD BENGALURU-560 001. 4. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER SUPPLY AND SANITARY E-1, SUB DIVISION, BWSSB KALYAN NAGAR BENGALURU-560 043. Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11025 WP No. 19608 of 2021 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B. SUKANYA BALIGA, AGA FOR R1; SRI. PRAVEEN KUMAR B.M.,ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.L. SANJEEV, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO REGULARIZE THE SANITARY CONNECTION TO THE PREMISES NUMBER 58, 7TH CROSS, BABUSAPALYA , CHALKERE VILLAGE, BANGALORE BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER Petitioner is before this Court being aggrieved by the inaction on the part respondent-Authorities in regularizing his sanitary and water connections to the premises bearing No.58, 7th Cross, Babusapalya, Chalakere Village, Bengaluru. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the amount as demanded by the respondent-BWSSB in terms of Annexure-A dated 22.05.2013 aggregating to sum of Rs.8,68,780/- is already been paid. That despite payment of said amount, respondent-BWSSB have not regularized the same. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11025 WP No. 19608 of 2021 3. Learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 to 4 on the other hand submits that if the petitioner furnishes the required documents with regard to constructions and its legality, his request would be considered in accordance with law. 4. Submission is taken on record. 5. Petition is disposed of. 6. Petitioner to make fresh representation along with necessary documents, as may be requisitioned by the respondent-BWSSB for processing the request in accordance with law. On submission of the same. Respondent-BWSSB after affording sufficient opportunity to petitioner, pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within sixty days thereafter. 7. No precipitative actions shall be taken till disposal of the said representation. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE RL/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26