( 2026:HHC:29365 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA FAO(MV) No.122 of 2024 Date of Decision: 17.07.2026 ___________________________________________________ Jash Kaur (deceased) through LRs ....Appellants Versus Ashiya and others …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the appellant: None. For the respondents: Mr. Abhay Gupta, Advocate, vice Mr.Sarthak Mehta, for respondent No.1. Mr. Anmol Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.4 & 5. Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Harshita Dogra, Advocate, for respondent No.6. Respondent No.7 already ex-parte. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) From the perusal of record, it is clear that neither the application for deletion of the name of respondent No.3 has been filed on behalf of the appellants, nor steps have 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? ( 2026:HHC:29365 ) been taken for the service of respondent No.2, despite last opportunity granted in this respect. 2. Today, despite repeated calls, none has appeared on behalf of the appellants. It appears that the appellants are not interested in pursuing the appeal. Therefore, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) July 17, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)