SMT. PINKI JAIN W/O SHRI NEERAJ AGRAWAL v. THE UCO BANK
CW/1060/2026 · 2026-02-02
Anand Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15988 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15988 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:4709] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1060/2026 Smt. Pinki Jain W/o Shri Neeraj Agrawal, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Plot No.15, Leela Kunj, Dharam Park, Shyam Nagar-2, Ajmer Road, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The Uco Bank, Through Chief Managing Director, Dop, Hq- Iind, Dd-3 And 4, Sector-1, Salt Lake, Kolkata (W.b.).
2. Executive Director, Uco Bank, Hrm Dept, Discipline Cell, 4Rth Floor Head Office 10 Btm Sarani, Kolkata (W.b).
3. The General Manager Personal Services, Uco Bank, Hrm Dept, Discipline Cell, 4Rth Floor Head Office 10 Btm Sarani, Kolkata (W.b.).
4. The Deputy General Manager And Zonal Head, Uco Bank, Zonal Office, 2Nd Floor, 380 Saket Nagar,, Indore (M.p.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hanuman Choudhary, Adv. For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 02/02/2026
1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the
order dated 30.12.2025 passed by DGM and Zonal Head, UCO Bank cum Disciplinary Authority, whereby penalty of dismissal from bank service has been inflicted upon the petitioner.
2. It is not disputed that departmental appeal against the penalty order is maintainable, however, the appeal could not be filed by the petitioner.
3. In view of above, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal against the penalty
[2026:RJ-JP:4709] (2 of 2) [CW-1060/2026]
order dated 30.12.2025 and in case, such appeal is preferred by the petitioner, same shall be decided by the appellate authority strictly in accordance with law and in expeditious manner.
(ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /29