Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15988 (JHR)

Awadh Kishor Mehra And Ors v. Personnel And Adminis Reform

WPC/5768/2015 · 2026-06-10

Sujit Narayan Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:16660 Page | 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S). No. 5768 of 2015 --------- 1.Awadh Kishor Mehra, son of Sri Narayan Mehra, resident of Village-Bardahi, P.O.-Pathardda, P.S.-Sarath, District-Deoghar. 2.Satyajeet Tiwary @ Satyajeet Kumar Tiwary, sonof Sri Sheosewak Baidyanath Tiwary, resident of Road No.1, Sukhdeo Nagar, Ratu Road, P.O. & P.S.-Hehal, District- Ranchi. 3.Raushan Ram, son of late Ramcharan Ram, resident of Mohalla-Yashwant Nagar, Road No.2, P.O. & P.S-Sadar, Town and District-Hazaribagh. 4.Pradeep Kumar, son of Sri Sahdeo Nayak, resident of Village-Chatti, P.O. Nawagarh Chatti, P.S.-Dhanwar, District-Giridih. … … Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, having office at near Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, Town & District- Ranchi. 2.The Principal Secretary, Personnel Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha Department, Government of Jharkhand, having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, Town and District-Ranchi. 3.Jharkhand Public Service Commission, through its Chairman, having office at Circular Road, P.O.-GPO, P.S.- Kotwali, Town and District-Ranchi. 4.The Secretary, Jharkhand Public Service Commission, having office at Circular Road, P.O.-GPO, P.S.-Kotwali, Town and District-Ranchi ... ... ... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD ---------- For the Petitioners : Mrs. Neha Bhardwaj, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anup Kumar Agrawal, AC to GA IV For the JPSC : Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Adv Mr. Prince Kumar, Adv. ---------- 15/Dated: 10th June, 2026 1. Mrs. Neha Bhardwaj, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instruction, submits that the writ petition may be 2026:JHHC:16660 Page | 2 rendered to be infructuous since the grievance has already been redressed. 2. Such submission has been made in presence of learned counsel for the respondents. 3. In view thereof, the writ petition stands dismissed being infructuous and as such disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) 10th June, 2026 Alankar/-