Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15986 (JHR)

AMAN SETHI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY

WPC/6799/2025 · 2026-06-10

Rajesh Shankar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:16653-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.6799 of 2025 ----- Aman Sethi, son of Late Sh. S.P. Sethi, resident of S-541, Greater Kailash-II, P.O. and P.S.-Greater Kailash, New Delhi .......... Petitioner. -Versus- 1. State of Jharkhand, through its Secretary, Department of Mines of Geology, Nepal House, Doranda, Ranchi. 2. Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur. 3. District Mining Officer, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur. 4. Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi. 5. District Mining Officer, Ranchi. 6. Jharkhand State Mineral Development Corporation Limited, through its Managing Director, Doranda, Ranchi. 7. NKAS Services Pvt. Ltd., through the District Mining Officer, Vikas Bhawan, Kutchery Road, Sadar, Ranchi. 8. Asbolus Global Pvt. Ltd., through the District Mining Officer, Vikas Bhawan, Kutchery Road, Ranchi. 9. Samarth Ad Protex Pvt. Ltd., through the District Mining Officer, Vikas Bhawan, Kutchery Road, Ranchi. 10. Godavari Commodities Pvt. Ltd., through the District Mining Officer, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur. 11. SG Projects Pvt. Ltd., through the District Mining Officer, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur. .......... Respondents. ----- CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Salona Mittal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, A.G. For the Res. No.7 : Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate Ms. Nidhi Lall, Advocate For the Res. No.8 : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Advocate For the Res. No.9 : Mr. Ankit Apurva, Advocate For the Res. No.11 : Mr. Bharat Kumar, Advocate ----- Order No.06 Date: 10.06.2026 1. Mr. Salona Mittal, the learned counsel for the petitioner, based on instructions from the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents including the learned Advocate General state that they have no objection to the petitioner withdrawing this petition. 2026:JHHC:16653-DB 2 3. Accordingly leave is granted and this petition is disposed of as withdrawn. No costs. 4. I.As., if any, that are not yet disposed of, will no longer survive and are consequently disposed of. (M. S. Sonak, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) 10th June, 2026 Sanjay/Rohit Uploaded on 11.06.2026