PANKAJ KUMAR SAHU ALIAS PANKAJ SAW ALIAS PANKAJ KUMAR SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./2907/2026 · 2026-06-09
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15985 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15985 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:16400
--1-- A.B.A. No. 2907 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 2907 of 2026
---- Pankaj Kumar Sahu @ Pankaj Saw @ Pankaj Kumar Saw, aged about 31 years, son of Nandlal Sahu, resident of Road No.5, Yamuna Nagar, Harmu, Doranda, PO and PS – Doranda, Ranchi
.... Petitioner -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner :- Mr. Navin Kr. Singh, Advocate
For the State
:- Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Advocate
---- 02/09.06.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bariyatu P.S. Case No.20 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 17(b), 22(b) and 29 of N.D.P.S. Act pending in the Court of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, NDPS, Latehar.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has come only on the confessional statement and the petitioner has nothing to do with the opium. He further submits that false allegations are made that apprehended accused persons were going to handover the said opium to the petitioner. He then submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.18 of the petition.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer
2026:JHHC:16400
--2-- A.B.A. No. 2907 of 2026
and submits that the name of the petitioner has come on the confessional statement.
5. Considering that the name of the petitioner has come on the confessional statement and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.18 of the petition and the only allegation is made that the apprehended co-accused persons were going to handover the said opium to the petitioner. In the attending facts and circumstances of this case, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge- cum-Special Judge, NDPS, Latehar in connection with Bariyatu P.S. Case No.20 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 09.06.2026 Sangam/