APHC010048572026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3007/2026 Between: 1. PALURI VENKATA SURYA SATYA BHARGAV, S/O LATE LAKSHMINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 38-30- 111/1, SAL NAGAR 11 LANE, NEAR PUNJAB HOTEL SIVALAYAM, MARRIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM -530018. 2. PALURI RAMA, W/O LATE LAKSHMINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O R/O D. NO. 38-30-111/1, SAL NAGAR 11 LANE, NEAR PUNJAB HOTEL SIVALAYAM, MARRIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530018. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPLE SECRETARY (HOME DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI-522 202. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIZINAGARAM , VIZINAGARAM DISTRICT - 535002 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II - TOWN POLICE STATION, VIZINAGARAM, VIZINAGARAM DISTRICT - 535002. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K N P VAMSIKRISHNA 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed for the following relief: “…to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent no. 3 in summoning the petitioners herein to S.H.O. and pressuring for out of court settlement in civil disputes relating to the property of an extent of Ac. 0-73 cents of dry land in Sy. No. 227-2 Situated Vizinagaram Mandal, Vizinagaram District and directing to handover property to the defendants in the suit as illegal, irregular, arbitrary and violation provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 without following due process of law and also contrary to Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent not to interfere into the civil disputes…” 2. Mr.K.N.P.Vamsi Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the police have been interfering in civil disputes pending between the petitioners and certain other persons. 3. Sri Ajay Babu, learned Government Pleader for Home, submits that the police have never called the petitioners to the police station and have never interfered in the civil disputes pending between the petitioners and certain other persons. 4. On perusal of the record, it is seen that Petitioner No.2 has filed a civil suit in O.S.No. 132 of 2025 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram. Another suit in O.S. No. 134 of 2025 was also filed before the same Court. In I.A.No.356 of 2025 in O.S.No.134 of 2025, by order dated 22.10.2025, an interim injunction was granted restraining the respondents/defendants from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners' property. 3 5. The petitioners, in their affidavit, have categorically stated that the police have been interfering in the civil dispute at the behest of the defendants in the above-mentioned suits. However, the learned Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, submits that the petitioners submitted a representation to Respondent No.2 informing that civil suits are pending between the petitioners and the defendants. The petitioners requested Respondent No.2 to issue necessary instructions to the Station House Officer/Respondent No.3 not to interfere in the civil disputes pending between the petitioners and the defendants in the above suits. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, Respondent No.3 is directed not to interfere in the civil disputes pending between the petitioners and the defendants in O.S.Nos.132 and 134 of 2025 on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram. 7. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. ________________________ Dr.Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J. Date: 03.02.2026 Note: Issue C.C. by today B/o PRA