[2026:RJ-JP:4586] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1170/2026 Vishnu @ Mahakal Son Of Tarachand, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Harijano Ka Mohalla, Ward No. 19, Kasba Reengas, Police Station Reengas, District Sikar, Rajasthan (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jal Neem Ka Thana) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vidhut Kumar Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 31/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.53/2025 registered at Police Station Reengas, District Sikar for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 125, 119(1) & 352 of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the challan papers alongwith rejection bail order passed by the learned trial Court. 4. The Injured witness, namely, Kamlesh has been examined as PW-2 before the learned trial Court. [2026:RJ-JP:4586] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1170/2026] 5. In the statement of the injured-witness-Kamlesh, he has made an allegation against the accused-petitioner of inflicting injury by stone and the said injury has been opined to be grievous. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 08.06.2025. 6. Taking into consideration the allegation against the accused- petitioner and so also the fact that he is in judicial custody since 08.06.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /164