Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15973 (GAU)

M/S KALYAN ASSOCIATES v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS

WP(C)/5156/2026 · 2026-10-06

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010199602026 2026:GAU-AS:15113 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5156/2026 M/S KALYAN ASSOCIATES REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR KULEN PHUKAN, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDENT OF CHANDMARI, GUWAHATI, DISTRICT KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-3. 3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT BASISHTHA GUWAHATI-29. 4:THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT LAKHIMPUR WATER RESOURCES CIRCLE NORTH LAKHIMPUR 5:EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT DHEMAJI W.R. DIVISION DHEMAJI 6:DISTRICT COMMISSIONER Page No.# 2/3 DHEMAJI ASSA For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.K. Jain, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R. Talukdar, Govt. Advocate Ms. R. Deka, Standing Counsel BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 07.10.2026 Heard Mr. D.K. Jain, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R. Talukdar, the learned Government Advocate appears on behalf of the State and Ms. R. Deka, the learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the Water Resources Department. 2. From a perusal of the writ petition, there is nothing mentioned as to when the work order was issued. The work order, the completion certificate and the details of the amount paid in the meantime have not been enclosed with the writ petition. Under such circumstances, the writ petition, on the face of it, is not maintainable. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to re-file the same by providing the necessary details. Page No.# 3/3 4. Considering the above, the writ petition, therefore, stands closed on withdrawal. 5. Liberty, however, is given to the petitioner to re-file the writ petition by providing the necessary details, i.e., by including in the writ petition the work order, the completion certificate and the details of the amount paid in the meantime. JUDGE Comparing Assistant