[2026:RJ-JP:2729] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 898/2026 Mohit Kumawat S/o Shri Kailash Kumawat, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ward No. 12, Shyam Colony, Parbatsar, P.s. Parbatsar, District Didwana Kuchaman, Rajasthan. (Accused Petitioner Is In Confinement At Central Jail Jaipur And In Judicial Custody Since 02.01.2026). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 21/01/2026 1. The accused-petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.886/2025 registered with the Police Station Kardhani, District Jaipur (West) for offence under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 338, 336(3), 336(4), 340(2) and 61(2) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that as per the contents of the F.I.R., the allegations against the present accused-petitioner is that he has borrowed loan from the bank by mortgaging the plot of the complainant and is said to have purchased the said plot by preparing forged documents through Rakesh Saini. He further submits that the accused- [2026:RJ-JP:2729] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-898/2026] petitioner is a bonafide purchaser as he purchased the plot from Rakesh after borrowing loan from the bank. He also submits that the accused-petitioner has paid all the due amount of the bank. He further submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 02.01.2026 and he is no more required for any kind of recovery or interrogation and trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the case diary. 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that the accused-petitioner has borrowed the loan from the bank, which he has already paid and the fact that as per the contents of the F.I.R., the complainant is in possession over the plot in question, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before [2026:RJ-JP:2729] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-898/2026] that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /148