SACHIN KUMAR AND ANR v. UT OF J AND K TH DGP POLICE HEADQUARTER GANDHI NAGAR JAMMU AND ORS
WP(C)/1844/2026 · 2026-07-01
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1597 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1597 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP (C) No. 1844/2026
Sachin Kumar and another …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
U.T. of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Assisting Counsel to Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 01.07.2026
1. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on 30.06.2026 and same is position today as well.
2. Today, when the matter was taken up, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. An inference can be drawn that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the instant petition. The same is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 01.07.2026 Nikhil
Sr. No. 49