Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1597 (BOM)

GANESH SHANKARLAL DARAK BEING PROPRIETOR v. THE COMMISSIONER CHATRAPATI SAMBHAJINAGAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

CA/7831/2026 · 2026-07-31

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 18.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 18 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7831 OF 2026 IN WP/2782/2024 GANESH SHANKARLAL DARAK BEING PROPRIETOR VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER CHATRAPATI SAMBHAJINAGAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ... WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2782 OF 2024 ... Advocate for the Applicant : Mr. Rohit Dhongade h/f. Mr. Yadkikar Amit A Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. A.P. Bhandari Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Ms. Shital S. Karle h/f. Ms. Anjali Dube … CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 31.07.2026 PER COURT : . For the reasons recorded in the application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’. Amendment be carried out within a period of three (03) weeks. The petitioner to serve the amended copy to the other side. The respondents may file file their affidavit in reply, within a period of two (02) weeks thereafter. ( ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. ) ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. ) vsj.. 2026:BHC-AUG:33797-DB