Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15968 (CHH)

SMT. SAROJ MAHANT v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/9009/2019 · 2026-01-28

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:4933 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9009 of 2019 Smt. Saroj Mahant W/o Shri Madan Mohan Mahant Aged About 44 Years Lecturer (L.B.) At Government Higher Secondary School Patrapali, Block Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 4 - Block Education Officer Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Ms. Apoorva Pandey, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Panel Lawyer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 29.01.2026 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for grant of arrears of revised pay scale for the period from 01.05.2013 to April, 2016, petitioner herein may be permitted to file a comprehensive SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 representation alongwith supportive documents before the concerned respondents No.02 & 04, which may be directed to be considered and decided within a reasonable time. 3. Be that as it may, the petitioner is permitted to file aforesaid representation alongwith copy of this order and supportive documents before the concerned respondents authority within 04 weeks’ from today and, in turn, the concerned respondents are directed to consider and decide petitioner’s said representation in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order preferably within 06 weeks from the date of receipt of said representation. 4. With aforesaid observation and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, both the writ petitions stand finally disposed of. No cost. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if