Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15967 (HP)

MEGHNA BHARDWAJ AND OTHERS v. VIBHORE BHARDWAJ

CRMPM/357/2026 · 2026-07-17

Ranjan Sharma, Vivek Singh Thakur

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Meghna Bhardwaj & Others v. Vibhore Bhardwaj Cr.MP (M) No.357 of 2026 17.07.2026. Present: Ms. Seema Kaushal Guleria, Advocate, for the applicants. Ms. Preetika Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Gaurav Kochhar, Advocate, for the respondent. Cr.MP (M) No.357 of 2026 This application has been filed for condonation of delay of 17 days in filing the revision petition against the order passed by the Family Court. Though, reply has not been filed to the application, however, prayer for condonation of delay has been opposed by learned counsel appearing for the respondent on the ground that day to day delay, as required to be explained under law, has not been explained. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that there were justifiable and sufficient reasons, which prevented the applicants from filing the revision petition within the prescribed period. Considering the averments made in the application and submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered opinion that delay in filing the review petition deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, the delay of 17 days in filing the revision petition is condoned. Application is allowed and disposed of. Cr. Revision (FC) No._______ of 2026 [Cr. Rev.(FC) No.1134 of 2026] Be registered. Respondent is duly represented. Copy of Revision Petition be supplied to the opposite counsel during course of the day. List for consideration on 07.08.2026. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge (Ranjan Sharma) July 17, 2026 Judge [Shivender]