APHC010047432026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 2789/2026 Between: 1.TATINA VIJAYA SARADHI, S/O. T. SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. D. NO. 12-44, SITANAGARAM VILLAGE, JAGGAMPET MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT - 533435. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522002 2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, FOR STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI , GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522503. 3.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT - 533001. 4.THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PEDDAPURAM, KAKINADA DISTRICT - 533437. 5.THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAKINADA 3RD TOWN POLICE STATION, KAKINADA DISTRICT - 533001. 6.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KAKINADA 3RD TOWN POLICE STATION, KAKINADA DISTRICT - 533001. 7.Y KRISHNA, S/O. Y. VENKATA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RIO. D.NO. 16-34-63/25, SAMBHAMURTHI NAGAR, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT - 533001. 2 8.KOTHA VERRA NAGA VENKATA RAO, S/O. VEERA RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 2-31, PALAPU STREET, JAGGAMPET, KAKINADA DISTRICT - 533435. 9.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, JAGGAMPET TOWN POLICE STATION, JAGGAMPET MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT - 533435. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.T N M RANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “… to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent no 2 to 4 herein not taking any action on the unofifcial respondent no 7 and 8 through official respondent no 5 to 6 as illegal arbitrary colorable exercise and violation of the legal duty caste on them and violation of the Article 14 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondent no 2 to 4 herein to take necessary action basing on the representation dated 24 01 2026 and 27 01 2026 by protecting the petitioner and his family members and properties and pass…” 2. Sri T.N.M.Ranga Rao, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner being aggrieved by the continued inaction of Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in taking action against unofficial Respondent Nos.7 and 8 on the basis of his representations dated 24.01.2026 and 27.01.2026, the present Writ Petition has been filed. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3 4. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, submits that there is a civil dispute between the Petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 5. In view of the above, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the Petitioner to invoke appropriate civil remedy against the unofficial Respondents. 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 10.02.2026 VTS