Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15960 (PNJ)

SANDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/3849/2026 · 2026-04-07

Manisha Batra

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-38 IN 115 SANDEEP STATE OF CORAM: Present: MANISHA 1. Constitutio official resp at the han representati 2. submitted 25.03.2026 (Annexure but the sam thereon. H satisfied i Superintend representati 3849-2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUN AT CHANDIG DEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER Versus TE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS AM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE **** Mr. Lupil Gupta Advocate for Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Hary ISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been titution of India seeking issuance of a ial respondents No.2 to 4 to protect the e hands of respondents No.5 to sentation dated 25.03.2026 (Annexure At the very outset, learned itted that the petitioners have rec 2026 before the Superintendent of exure P-3) raising their grievances as he same has not yet been considere on. He further submitted that at this fied if appropriate directions are rintendent of Police, Dabwali, Distri sentation filed by the petitioners and ta F PUNJAB AND HARYANA NDIGARH CRWP-3849-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.04.2026 ...Petitione ersus ERS ...Responden ICE MANISHA BATRA te for the petitioners , Haryana s been filed under Article 226 of th ce of a writ of mandamus directing th tect the life and liberty of the petitione to 9 and to take action on the nexure P-3). arned counsel for the petitioners ha e recently filed a representation o ent of Police, Dabwali, District Sirs ces as mentioned in the present petitio sidered and no action has been take at this stage, the petitioners would b s are issued to respondent No.2 District Sirsa to decide the aforesa and take necessary action thereon. .2026 titioners ondents of the ting the titioners n their ers has tion on ct Sirsa petition n taken ould be No.2- foresaid AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.07 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-384 3. 4. behalf of th due course. course of th 5. commentin disposed of aforesaid re within a p accordance petitioners, order to pr 07.04.2026 Amit Sharma Whe Whe 3849-2026 -2- Notice of motion. Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, lf of the respondents-State and submit ourse. Let a complete set of the paperb se of the day. In view of the limited prayer enting anything on the merits of t sed of at this stage with a direction said representation dated 25.03.2026 in a period of 15 days from today, rdance with law. Needless to say, ioners, the official respondents would p r to protect their life and liberty. .2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Ye Whether reportable Ye Haryana, has advance notice submits that the needful will be done paperbook be supplied to her during th rayer made by the petitioners, witho ts of the case, the present petition ction to respondent No.2 to decide th .2026 (Annexure P-3) of the petitione oday, by passing a speaking order say, if any threat is found to th ould provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No tice on done in ring the without tition is cide the titioners order in to the curity in AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.07 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.