SATISH CHAND OJHA S/O RAMDEEN OJHA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3454/2026 · 2026-04-09
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1596 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1596 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:14793] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 3454/2026 Satish Chand Ojha S/o Ramdeen Ojha, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Tubell Colony, Vah, Police Station Vah, District Agar, U.p., Presently R/o Plot No. 153, Durga Nagar, Poonam Basti, Sogariya, Kota, District Kota (Raj.). (At Present Confined In District Jail Baran) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagdish Nagar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 09/04/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this second bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.551/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Baran, District Baran for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 409 of IPC.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that though the allegation against the present petitioner is that he obtained the appointment of the said post by improper means but it is also submitted that the petitioner who was low paid employee, has been terminated from service. The petitioner is
[2026:RJ-JP:14793] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3454/2026] behind the bars since 17.12.2025. The charge-sheet has already been filed. The case is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the second bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Satish Chand Ojha S/o Ramdeen Ojha, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/22