Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15959 (KAR)

SRI RAMACHANDRA v. THE TAHSILDAR

WP/6807/2026 · 2026-03-02

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12610 WP No. 6807 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.6807 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAMACHANDRA S/O LATE RAMALH @ SURGONDANAHALLI RAMAIH AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, R/O NO.193, 11TH A MAIN, NEAR KALAPPA BLOCK, SRINAGAR, BANGALORE. 2. SMT. RAMAKKA, D/O LATE RAMAIAH SURAGONDANAHALLI RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/AT SINGRAHALLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 3. SMT. NARASAMMA, W/O NARASIMHAIAH, D/O LATE RAMAIAH SURAGONDANAHALLI RAMAIAH, R/AT NO.61, MAVALLIPURA, SHIVAKOTE POST, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU. 4. SMT. SAKAMMA, W/O LATE RANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, 5. SRI. KRISHNAPPA M. R. S/O LATE RANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12610 WP No. 6807 of 2026 6. SRI. NARASIMHAMURTHY M. R. S/O LATE RANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 7. SRI. MUNIRAJU M. R, S/O LATE RANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 8. NAGARAJU M. R, S/O LATE RANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, NO.4 TO 8 ARE RESIDING AT NO.129, MAVALLIPURA, SHIVAKOTE POST, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU. 9. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA, W/O RAJANNA, D/O LATE RANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO.93, TIPPURU, KUMBALAGODU HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. BASAVARAJ ARANI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B MANJUNATH., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TAHSILDAR BANGALORE DIVISION, YELAHANKA TALUK, YELAHNAKA – 560 064 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH DIVISIION BANGALORE – 560 001 …RESPONDENTS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12610 WP No. 6807 of 2026 (BY SMT. B.P.RADHA., AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI / MANDAMUS OR ANY WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO IMPLEMENT THE IMPUGNED ORDER FOUND AT ANNEXURE-A PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT, IN R.A NO.888/2022-23 DATED 30.01.2023 AND ETC THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice of both the respondents. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate raises preliminary objection that the order impugned is passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Bangalore North Sub-Division under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (for short, 'the Act') and the same is revisable before the Deputy Commissioner under Section 136(3) of the Act. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12610 WP No. 6807 of 2026 3. Upholding the submissions of the learned Additional Government Advocate, the writ petition stands disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioners to approach the Deputy Commissioner to redress their grievance. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16