Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15953 (GAU)

RANU TEA ESTATE AND ANR v. STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/5485/2026 · 2026-10-06

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010218112026 2026:GAU-AS:15120 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5485/2026 RANU TEA ESTATE AND ANR MILON NAGAR, DIBRUGARH, P.O. RATANPUR, DIBRUGARH-786003. 2: GYASUDDIN AHMED MANAGING PARTNER RANU TEA ESTATE MILON NAGAR P.O. RATANPUR DIBRUGARH-786003 VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, LABOUR WELFARE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR-781006. 2:DISTRICT COMMISSIONER DIBRUGARH P.O. DIBRUGARH. 3:OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER DIBRUGARH REPRESENTED BY ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER. 4:MR NIZAMUDDIN AHMED S/O LATE ANWARUDDIN AHMED RESIDENT OF EAST MILON NAGAR NEAR DOORDARSAN KENDRA . RATANPUR DIBRUGARH PIN 786003. 5:MRS SHAHANA DOMBECK D/O LATE ANWARUDDIN AHMED RESIDENT OF 6318 PIEDMOUNT RD Page No.# 2/2 MADISON WI-53711 USA. REPRESENTED BY HER ATTORNEY MR. NIZAMUDDIN AHMED MILON NAGAR P.O. RATANPUR DIBRUGARH-786003 Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. S Dutta Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. R Talukdar Govt. Advocate, Assam B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 07.10.2026 Heard Mr. S Dutta, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners, who submits that the grievance of the Petitioners in respect to the communication dated 11.09.2026 was the observations made in the said communication that the Petitioners have to pay 50% of the payment. 2. He, however, submits that subsequently upon the requests made in the communication dated 11.09.2026, the share of the Petitioners was reduced to 35%. Under such circumstances, the Petitioners do not have any grievances, for which, the Petitioners would not like to further pursue the present writ petition and seeks to withdraw the same. 3. Taking into account the above, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant