Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15953 (AP)

PAIDI VIJAYA RAMANA RAO v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/2987/2026 · 2026-02-19

Nyapathy Vijay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010048772026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 2987/2026 Between: 1. PAIDI VIJAYA RAMANA RAO, S/O APPARAO, AGED 53 YEARS, R/O.TADIVALASA VILLAGE AND POST PONDURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238 2. THE COMMISSIONER/DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522503 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AT SRIKAKULAM-532001 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AT SRIKAKULAM - 532001 5. THE DEPUTY EDUCATION OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AT SRIKAKULAM - 532001 6. ZILLA PARISHAD HIGH SCHOOL, TADIVALASA, PONDURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS HEAD MASTER-532168 2 7. SRI BALIA KANTAYYA, S/O.MUKHALINGAM AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. HEAD MASTER, ZILLA PARISHAD HIGH SCHOOL, TADIVALASA, PONDURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT- 532168 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents on the representation dated 03.11.2025 to initiate necessary action against the 7th respondent who misused his official capacity as Head Master of 6th respondent school and responsible for the misappropriation of funds of the 6th respondent school, issuance of false Study Certificates and unauthorized cutting and selling of existing trees in the 6 respondent school as illegal, irregular, irrational and violation of principles of natural justice besides violation of Constitutional guarantees and to consequently direct the respondents to take necessary action against the 7 respondent who is responsible for the misappropriation of funds, issuance of false Study Certificates and cutting and selling of the existing trees in the 6 respondent school, in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to take immediate necessary action against the7th respondent who is responsible for the misappropriation of funds, issuance of false Study Certificates and cutting and selling of the existing trees in the 6th respondent school by duly considering the representation dated 03.11.2025, in the interest of justice pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K JYOTHI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 3 1. GP FOR SERVICES III The Court made the following: 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.2987 OF 2026 O R D E R: The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the inaction on the part of the Respondents in not considering the representation of the Petitioner dated 03.11.2025 with regard to the misuse of official capacity by Respondent No.7 as Head Master in Respondent No.6/School, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. It was submitted by learned counsel for the Petitioner that after the filing of the Writ Petition, the Petitioner was informed of action being initiated on the representation given by the Petitioner and that a preliminary enquiry was conducted against Respondent No.7, and a preliminary enquiry report was submitted. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submitted that necessary action will be taken on the basis of enquiry report. 4. In view of the same, the grievance of the Petitioner is addressed and accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 20.02.2026 chs 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 55 WRIT PETITION NO:2987/2026 Dt.20.02.2026 chs