[2026:JHHC:16421] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4313 of 2026 ------ Subodh Kumar, son of Hirday Narayan Yadav, aged about 33 years, resident of Bhuiphor Bank Colony, P.O. Sabalpur Road, P.S. Gosaidi, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Prabhat Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, Addl. P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-09-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Dhanbad P.S. Case No.59 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 316 (2), 318 (4), 336 (3), 338, 340 (2), 339, 341 (3), 204, 319 (2) and 61 (2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons, allured and induced the informant and other victims to provide job in the Railway in sports quota and other quota and the only allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has taken Rs.20,000/- which has already been seized by the police. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-14 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 11.05.2026 passed in B.A. No.3888 of 2026. It is also submitted that charge- sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 13.02.2026 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in connection with Dhanbad P.S. Case No.59 of 2026 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-09.06.2026-Animesh/