Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1595 (JHR)

ANWAR HUSSAIN v. THE CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR

WPC/5411/2018 · 2026-02-02

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:2655 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 5411 of 2018 Anwar Hussain, aged about 59 years, son of Late Nizamuddin, Gandhi Nagar, Hill Top Colony, Qr. No. 1B-50, P.O Sunday Bazar, P.S. Gandhi Nagar, Dist: Bokaro. ... … Petitioner(s) Versus 1 The Central Coalfields Ltd. a registered company under the Companies Act, having its office at Darbhanga House, Kutchery Road, P.O & P.S: Ranchi Dist: Ranchi through its Chairman cum Managing Director 2. The Chairman cum- Managing Director of M/s Central Coalfields Ltd. having its office at Darbhanga House, Kutchery Road, PO & PS: Ranchi Dist: Ranchi 3. The Director of Personnel, M/s Central Coalfields Ltd. having its office at Darbhanga House, Kutchery Road, PO & PS Ranchi Dist: Ranchi 4. The General Manager of Personnel M/s Central Coalfields Ltd. having its office at Darbhanga House, Kutchery Road, P.O & P.S:- Ranchi Dist: Ranchi 5. The General Manager, B & K Area, office at Kargali, P.O & P.S. Bermo, Dist:- Bokaro 6. The Area Personnel Manager, B & K Area, office at Kargali, P.O & P.S: Bermo, Dist:- Bokaro 7 The Agent/Project Officer, Bokaro Colliery, PO Sunday Bazar, P.S. Gandhi Nagar, Dist: Bokaro. ... … Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate -------- Order No. 8 /Dated: 2nd February 2026 The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner against the order of termination from service dated 15.02.2012 and also the order passed by the appellate authority dated 16.04.2015. 2. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application in order to file a declarative application declaring the petitioner as son of the deceased employee; upon death of whom he was given appointment. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection though 2026:JHHC:2655 2 he submits that a full-fledged enquiry was conducted but it is a factual dispute whether the petitioner was son of the deceased employee or not; upon death whom he has been appointed. 4. Accordingly, the instant writ application is disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner as prayed for. 5. Pending I.As, if any, also stand disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 2nd February 2026 Amit Uploaded on 04/02/2026