Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1595 (GAU)

SRI KIRAN PEGU AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./40/2026 · 2026-01-20

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010289382025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./40/2026 SRI KIRAN PEGU AND ANR S/O- LATE JUGAL PEGU RESIDENT OF UKHAL CHUK, P.O.- GARAMUR, P.S- GARAMUR, DIST-MAJULI, ASSAM, PIN-785104. 2: SRI MANUJ PATHORI S/O-LATE PRATAP PATHARI RESIDENT OF NO.1 MISSAMORA P.O.- MISSAMORA P.S- GARAMUR DIST-MAJULI ASSAM PIN-785104 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, WILDLIFE. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. L GOGOI, Advocate for the Respondent : SPECIAL PP ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 21.01.2026 Heard Mr. L Gogoi, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Page No.# 2/2 Bankim Sarma, the learned Special Public Prosecutor for the Wild Life. 2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, whereby the petitioners, namely, 1. Sri Kiran Pegu & Sri Manuj Pathori have prayed for releasing them on bail, after they were arrested on 09.12.2025 in connection with Offence Case CIR No.02/2025 under Sections 9, 39, 51 and 52 of Wild Protection Act, 1972. 3. The petitioner Sri Kiran Pegu was carrying bag containing fire arm and he handed over the bag to the petitioner Sri Manuj Pathori. The bag containing a fire arm was used for killing Rhinos at Majuli. 4. Since the office alleged against the present petitioners is a serious one, this Court is of the opinion that these petitioners do not deserve to be released on bail at this stage. The bail petition is dismissed and disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant