Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15949 (BOM)

BALAMANI W/O NARAYAN GAUD AND ANOTHER v. RANJANA W/O RAMDAS BHOSALE

CA/4747/2026 · 2026-10-06

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 923 ca.4747.26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. 923 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4747 OF 2026 IN CRAST/25664/2025 BALAMANI W/O NARAYAN GAUD AND ANOTHER VERSUS RANJANA W/O RAMDAS BHOSALE ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Niranjan Vasant Dhake. ... CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 06th October, 2026. P.C.: 1 This is an application for condonation of delay of 130 days caused in filing the civil revision application. 2 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. Perused the application. 3 On perusal of the application, it appears that the delay is not deliberately caused. Therefore, to decide the lis finally on merits and in view of the law laid down by the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of M. D. A. Chaudhary Vs. Kartar Chand and Ors., MANU/SC/0877/2025, the application deserves to be allowed, in the interest of justice, as the delay is not deliberately caused. 4 For the reasons stated in the application, the delay stands condoned. The application stands allowed in the interest of justice, subject to removal of office objections within one week from today. The civil revision application be registered. 2 923 ca.4747.26.odt Civil Revision Application : 5 Issue notice to the respondent, returnable on 15th October, 2026. 6 In addition to regular mode of service, the learned counsel for the applicants is directed to serve the respondent by Speed Post. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] nga