Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15946 (KAR)

MUNIYAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/39537/2025 · 2026-04-25

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23010 WP No. 39537 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 39537 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MUNIYAMMA W/O LATE MARAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 2. RAMACHANDRAPPA S/O LATE MARAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 3. JAYALAKSHMAMMA D/O LATE LAKSHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 4. L. MUNI ANJINAIAH S/O LATE LAKSHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 5. VASANTHAMMA, D/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 6. NARAYANASWAMY S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 7. MUNIRAJU Digitally signed by YASHODA K L Location: High Court Of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23010 WP No. 39537 of 2025 S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 8. GOPAL S/O NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 9. SHOBHA W/O LATE MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 10. NAGARAJU S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 11. MUNINDRA S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS ALL ARE R/A YARTHIGANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HARIKRISHNA RAJU.K., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SURENDRA KUMAR N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY PRL. SECRETARY REVENUE DEPAPRMENT, BENGALURU-560001. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL BENGALURU-562110. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23010 WP No. 39537 of 2025 3. THE TAHASILDAR DEVANAHALLI, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562110. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.B.P.RADHA., AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE TAHASILDAR TO MAKE NECESSARY REVENUE ENTRIES IN RESPECT OF LAND MEASURING 3 ACRES IN SURVEY NO.55 OF YARTHIGANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, JOINTLY IN THE NAME OF PETITIONERS AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for all the respondents. 2. It is the contention of the petitioners that 3 acres of land in Sy.No.55 of Yarthiganahalli Village, Kasaba Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk, Bengaluru Rural District was granted to the petitioner's grandfather, late Sri Muniyappa - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23010 WP No. 39537 of 2025 on 23.02.1956. Saguvali chit as found at Annexure ‘A’ was also issued in favour of the grantee. However, the name of the grantee was never entered in the revenue records. Therefore, the petitioners have given a representation to the respondent-Tahsildar, Devanahalli Taluk, to enter the name of the original grantee, late Sri Muniyappa, in the revenue records pursuant to the grant made in his favour. Therefore, a direction is sought to the Tahsildar to enter the name of late Sri Muniyappa in the revenue records. 4. Having regard to the prayer made in the writ petition and submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the considered opinion that the respondent-Tahsildar, Devanahalli Taluk, Bengaluru Rural District, is duty bound to consider the representation given by the petitioners and pass necessary orders for entering the name of late Sri Muniyappa in the land revenue records. Needless to observe that the Tahsildar shall verify the original Grant Register, the Saguvali Chit Issue Register, and other contemporaneous records to find out - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23010 WP No. 39537 of 2025 about the genuineness of the grant made in favour of the Sri Muniyappa. If it is found that the grant was made in favour of Sri Muniyappa, then the Tahsildar shall proceed to enter the name of Sri Muniyappa in the land revenue records in accordance with law. 5. The entire exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. 7. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE JT/- CT: JL