Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15942 (CAL)

MOUTUSHI DHAR NEE PAUL v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM (DB)/4285/2024 · 2026-01-05

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

05/01/2026 M/L – 956 Court No.28 S. Kundu C.R.M.(DB) 4285 of 2024 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 (3) of the BNSS, 2023. In the matter of: Moutushi Dhar ...Petitioner. Ms. Nandini Chatterjee …for the petitioner. Mr. Prasun Kr. Dutta Mr. Rahul Ganguly …for the State. 1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner, although the State is represented. 2. Even on the last occasion i.e. on 8th December, 2025 no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was called on for hearing. 3. Accordingly, the application for cancellation of anticipatory bail is dismissed for default. (Jay Sengupta, J.)