Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15937 (RAJ)

KANHAIYA LAL BAGRI S/O PANNALAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/973/2026 · 2026-01-30

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4406] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 973/2026 Kanhaiya Lal Bagri S/o Pannalal, R/o 44, Aara Machine Par Par Bishnya Police Station Bhawanimandi, District Jhalawar, Presently Gopal Vihar Colony, Housing Board, Jhalawar Police Station Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Jhalawar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakash Kumar Jha For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Pramod Kumar, SHO PS Bhawani Mandi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 30/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 397/2025 registered at Police Station Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 316(2) and 61(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of Information Technology (Amendments) Act, 2008. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that charge- sheet has been filed in the instant matter. It is submitted that co- accused has been enlarged on bail and applicant is behind bars ever-since 06.10.2025. It is submitted that there are no criminal antecedents qua the applicant. [2026:RJ-JP:4406] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-973/2026] 3. The Investigating Officer has marked presence and has submitted that present is a case of organized crime in which nine persons have been arrested insofar and around 120 complaints are registered. It is submitted that in the instant matter, there are withdrawal of amount initiated by the accused-applicant. It is submitted that co-accused have been enlarged on bail though the case of the applicant is distinguishable from the co-accused, wherein deposits in Crores are there. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the instant bail application. 5. Heard and considered. 6. Considering the overall facts and taking note of the fact that it is a case of organized crime in which nine persons have been arrested and around 120 complaints are registered; that in the instant matter, there are withdrawal of amount is specifically attributed to the petitioner, but without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is Dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK /s-189