Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 / 2
2026:CGHC:4907
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1036 of 2026 Shobha Devi W/o Late Shri Ashok Vishwakarma Aged About 56 Years R/o Village - Satti Para Ward No. 26 Ambikapur, District - Surguja (Chhattisgarh)
... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, Water Resources Department, Shivnath Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District - Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Engineer - In - Chief Water Resources Department, Shivnath Bhawan Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Executive Engineer W.R.D. Division - Baikunthpur, District - Koriya (Chhattisgarh)
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Nikhil Sahu, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Advocate For State : Mr. Mayur Khandelwal, Panel Lawyer S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
Order on Board 29/01/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner who stood retired as Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employees is entitled for leave encashment but till date respondents have not extended the ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2026.01.30 15:06:50 +0530
2 / 2 benefit of leave encashment to petitioner. Identical issue came up for hearing before this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & Ors. Vs. State of C.G., in W.P.(S) No. 3870 of 2021 decided on 30.09.2022, wherein petitioners have raised identical issue which was allowed in their favour. He submits that at this stage, petitioner may be permitted to submit representation in light of Faguvaram Patel (supra) and respondents be directed to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioner expeditiously within specified time.
2. Learned State counsel submits that as petitioner is not pressing this petition on merits and is only seeking a direction to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioner, at this stage, she is having no objection.
3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents available on record.
4. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to make fresh representation. In the event, petitioner submit representation, her claim shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of representation keeping in mind decision in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra).
5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observation and direction. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Alfiza