1 of 2 915-fa.1888.2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 915 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1888 OF 2012 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH COLLECTOR, LATUR AND ANR. VERSUS GANGARAM GYANOBA NALAPURE AND ORS ... Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for the Appellant-State. ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 1st OCTOBER, 2026 P.C.:- 1. Since the acquisition proceedings pertain to the year 2004, the appeal is heard finally with the consent of the learned Advocates for the respective parties. 2. By this appeal, the Appellants/State are aggrieved by the Judgment and award dated 18.12.2010 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Ahmedpur, District Latur in L.A.R. No.113/2008. 3. Mr. A. M. Phule, learned Advocate for the Appellants/State submits that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the SLAO. 4. In fact the State Government vide Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said 2026:BHC-AUG:46524 2 of 2 915-fa.1888.2012 Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 5. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned order. Hence, the present Appeal is dismissed. 6. In view of dismissal of the Appeal, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) Tauseef