IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30860 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-328 Year-2017 Thana- GOGRI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Arun Muni S/o- Amir Muni Village- Bandiya Naya Tola badiya PS- Gogri OP Paura Distt- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandan Kumar Kashyap, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 07-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in connection with Gogri P.S. Case No. 328 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code which was earlier rejected vide order dated 10.10.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 55020 of 2018. 3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has assaulted with lathi to the brother of the informant due to which, he succumbed to his injuries. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and committed no offence. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30860 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026 2/2 custody since 31.05.2018. 5. From perusal of the order of the learned trial court, it transpires that out of eleven prosecution witnesses, ten are examined and the trial is almost concluded. 6. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail and has submitted that the main thrust of allegation is against the petitioner. 7. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and cirumstances of this case and as the trial is at its fag end, as such, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected. 8. However, the petitioner may be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after three months or even earlier before if the informant supports him during trial. 9. Learned trial court is directed to conclude the trial within three months positively. Shubham/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T