[2026:RJ-JP:2696] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1055/2026 Krishanvijay @ Rameshwar Son of Late Satynarayan, Age About 55 Years, R/o Infront Of Anaj Mandi, Vajirpur, Police Station Va- jirpur, District Sawai Madhopur, Raj. (At Present Confined in Sub Jail Gangapur City). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. N.K. Tiwari For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. Rachit Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 21/01/2026 1. This bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.153/2024 registered at Police Station Wajirpur, District Gangapur City (Rajasthan) for offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Counsel submits that petitioner has been made accused in this case solely on the basis of the fact that he was in contact with the co-accused persons. Counsel submits that co-accused namely- Shyam Singh, Jai Singh, Roop Singh and Fakir Chand have already been granted benefit of bail by this Court. It is submitted that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since 05.01.2026 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2026:RJ-JP:2696] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1055/2026] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently oppose the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced at bar, especially considering the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate, as also the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow the bail application. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Krishanvijay @ Rameshwar Son of Late Satynarayan shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /59