[2026:RJ-JP:4181] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 408/2026 Pushpendra Meena Son of Shri Vijay Singh, aged about 29 Years, Resident of Bhusawar, Tehsil Bhusawar, District Bhusawar Ra- jasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through P.P. 2. Abhishek Meena Son of Shri Suman, aged 19 Years, Resi- dent of Village Atrampura, Police Station Bhusawar, Dis- trict Bharatpur ( Rajasthan). 3. Lalit Meena Son of Shri Suman Meena, Resident of Village Atrampura, Police Station Bhusawar, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Karanpal Singh For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr. Arun Kumar Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 29/01/2026 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash entire criminal proceedings qua the petitioner arising out of FIR No.165/2025 registered at Police Station Bhusawar, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) for offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 140(3), 351(2) & 351(3) of BNS, 2023. 2. Parties are present in person. They have duly been identified by their respective counsel. [2026:RJ-JP:4181] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-408/2026] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is further submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings qua the petitioner in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant do not dispute the factum of compromise. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions advanced on behalf of the respective parties, the material made available for perusal, especially considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh versus State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. versus Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. reported in AIR 1992 SC 604, and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the entire criminal proceedings qua the petitioner arising out of FIR No.165/2025 registered at Police Station Bhusawar, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan), is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /130