Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15921 (PNJ)

ANKITA DEY v. HDFC BANK

CWP/9976/2026 · 2026-05-12

Jagmohan Bansal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 118 Ankita Dey HDFC Bank CORAM: HON Present: - Mr. Adv Mr. JAGMOHAN B 1. The the Constitution bank account ma 2. Lear petitioner is hav Pradesh, thus, thi 3. Face permission to w competent jurisdi 4. Dism 12.05.2026 Vimal Wh Wh N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGAR CW Dat Versus HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGM Mr. N.C.Manchanda, Mr. Vipul Tha Advocates, for the petitioner. Mr. A.P.S.Sehgal, Advocate, for the AN BANSAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner through instant petit tution of India is seeking direction t nt maintained with HDFC Bank. Learned counsel for the respondent is having bank account in the bra us, this Court has no territorial jurisdic Faced with this, learned couns to withdraw the petition with libe jurisdiction. Dismissed as withdrawn with afores (JA Whether speaking/reasoned Ye Whether reportable Ye NJAB AND HARYANA GARH CWP-9976-2026 Date of Decision: 12.05.2026 …Petitioner …Respondent AGMOHAN BANSAL ul Thakur & Mr. Akash Chaudhary, for the respondent-HDFC Bank. t petition under Articles 226/227 of tion to respondent to de-freeze her ondent-HDFC Bank pointed that the he branch at Mangalagiri, Andhra jurisdiction. counsel for the petitioner seeks h liberty to approach the Court of aforesaid liberty. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No , of e her t the dhra seeks rt of VIMAL KUMAR 2026.05.12 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.