IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1638 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2026 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1. Pankaj Kumar Singh S/o Nanku Singh @ Krishna Singh R/o Village - Koini Babu Tola, PS - Manjhagarh, District - Gopalganj. 2. Anuj Singh @ Anuj Kumar Singh @ Ujjawal Singh S/o Prem Singh R/o Village - Koini Babu Tola, PS - Manjhagarh, District - Gopalganj. ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Vishal Kumar Baitha S/o Keshu Baitha R/o Village - Koini Babu Tola, PS - Manjhagarh, District - Gopalganj. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Shashi Ranjan Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl. PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 20-05-2026 Heard the parties through virtual mode. 2. The present appeal has been preferred: “against the order dated 13.04.2026 passed in A.B.P No. 653 of 2026 arising out of Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 94 of 2026, whereby and where under the Learned Special Judge District and Additional Sessions Judge-XI-cum- S.C/S.T Act, Gopalganj rejected the anticipatory bail of the appellants in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 94 of 2026 which has been registered for offence under Sections Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1638 of 2026(3) dt.20-05-2026 2/2 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109(1), 351(2), 352 read with 3(5) of B.N.S. and 3(1)(r) and 3(1) (s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) Act, 1989 and section 27 and 30 of Arms Act.” 3. Learned counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the appeal. 4. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T