Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15919 (KAR)

SMT. LAKSHMIDEVI v. THE COMMISSIONER

MFA/5446/2019 · 2026-02-10

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8467 MFA No. 5446 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.5446 OF 2019 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. LAKSHMIDEVI W/O LATE NARASIMHALU AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 2. SRI M N BHARATH S/O LATE NARASIMHALU AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, 3. SRI M N ANANTH KUMAR S/O LATE NARASIMHALU AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, 4. SMT M N DHANALAKSHMI D/O LATE NARASIMHALU AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, APPELLANTS NO.1 TO 4 ARE RESIDING AT NO.46, 8TH CROSS, ARUNDATHINAGAR, SRIRAMPURA, BENGALURU-560 021. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. S VISWESWARAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N R SQUARE, BENGALURU-560002 Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8467 MFA No. 5446 of 2019 2. SMT PADMAVATHI D/O LATE SUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 3. ASHA D/O PADMAVATHI AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, 4. SUNITHA N D/O PADMAVATHI AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 4 ARE RESIDING AT NO.11/17-1, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 2ND CROSS, V.S. GARDEN, JAGAJEEVANNAGAR, BENGALURU-560018. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G M RAVIKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4; SRI. B.L.SANJEEV, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT Sri.S.Visweswaraiah., counsel for the appellants has appeared in person and submits that the appeal may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about infructuous of the appeal. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8467 MFA No. 5446 of 2019 The oral submission is placed on record. The Miscellaneous First Appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. Because of dismissal of the appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 86