Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15915 (RAJ)

DHARA SINGH CHOUDHARY S/O SH. NATHULAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1325/2026 · 2026-02-04

Sandeep Taneja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:5303] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1325/2026 1. Dhara Singh Choudhary S/o Sh. Nathulal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Arniya Neel Police Station Mehandvas, District Tonk (Raj.), At Present Tenant At Plot No. 100, Sunder Vihar on the top floor of Joya Health Clinic Sitapura, Police Station Sanganer Sader, District Jaipur (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). 2. Sandeep Choudhary S/o Sh. Ramprakash Choudhary, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Balapura Police Station Nager Fort, District Tonk (Raj.), At Present Tenant At Plot No. -100, Sunder Vihar on the top floor of Joya Health Clinic Sitapura, Police Station Sanganer Sader, District Jaipur (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). 3. Arvind Choudharay @ Bittu S/o Sh. Rampraksh Choudhary, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Balapura Police Station Nager Fort, District Tonk (Raj.) At Present Tenant At Plot No. -100, Sunder Vihar on the top floor of Joya Health Clinic Sitapura, Police Station Sanganer Sader, District Jaipur (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). 4. Yogesh Choudhary @ Shakti S/o Sh. Rajulal Choudhary, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Village Balapura Police Station Nagar Fort, District Tonk (Raj.) At Present Tenant at Plot No. -23, Kalyan Nagar Near Balaji Temple, Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshuman Saxena Mr. Vishal Gurjar Mr. Deepesh Kumawat Mr. Prem Prakash Bairwa Mr. Heera Lal Mr. Amit Choudhary Ms. Manisha Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 04/02/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. [2026:RJ-JP:5303] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1325/2026] 988/2025 registered at Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offence(s) under Section(s) 115(2), 126(2), 137(2) & 307 of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent persons and have been falsely implicated in this case as they have nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent, and the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and one of the co-accused namely, Bhupendra Singh Jatav has already been granted bail by the Trial Court vide order dated 30.01.2026. Learned counsel also submits that the petitioners are in custody since 25.12.2025 and conclusion of investigation and trial will take considerable time. He, therefore, prays that the petitioners may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, particularly the fact that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent and the offences are triable by Magistrate, without commenting anything on merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and accused-petitioners namely, (i) Dhara Singh Choudhary S/o Sh. Nathulal, (ii) Sandeep Choudhary S/o [2026:RJ-JP:5303] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1325/2026] Sh. Ramprakash Choudhary, (iii) Arvind Choudhary @ Bittu S/o Sh. Rampraksh Choudhary, and (iv) Yogesh Choudhary @ Shakti S/o Sh. Rajulal Choudhary are ordered to be released on bail, provided, each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J SKS/143