1 of 2 904-FA.781.2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904 FIRST APPEAL NO. 781 OF 2015 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER VERSUS MOTIRAM MAHADU SHINDE ... Mr. A. D. Wange, AGP for the Appellant/State. ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 1st OCTOBER, 2026 P.C.:- 1. Since the acquisition proceedings pertain to the year 1996, the appeal is heard finally with the consent of the learned Advocates for the respective parties. 2. By this appeal, the Appellants/State are aggrieved by the Judgment and award dated 12.12.2011 passed by the learned 2nd Civil Judge Senior Division at Aurangabad in L.A.R. No.213/2002. 3. Mr. A. D. Wange, learned AGP for the Appellants/State submits that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the SLAO. 4. In fact the State Government vide Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, 2026:BHC-AUG:46530 2 of 2 904-FA.781.2015 if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 5. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned order. Hence, the present Appeal is dismissed. 6. In view of dismissal of the Appeal, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) Tauseef