Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15912 (CHH)

Anjum Aara v. Jahangeer Ahmed

ACQA/56/2016 · 2026-01-30

Shri Radhakishan Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:5591 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 56 of 2016 Anjum Aara W/o Jahangir Ahmed Aged About 38 Years R/o Farid Nagar, Police Station Supela, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. Complainant ... Appellant versus 1 - Jahangeer Ahmed S/o Zahir Ahmed Aged About 45 Years R/o Eidgah Road, Farid Nagar, Supela Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh., 2 - Aslam Ahmed S/o Zahir Ahmed Aged About 44 Years R/o Eidgah Road, Farid Nagar, Supela Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh., 3 - Aalamgir S/o Zahir Ahmed Aged About 35 Years R/o Eidgah Road, Farid Nagar, Supela Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh., 4 - Salma Begum W/o Zahir Ahmed Aged About 68 Years R/o Eidgah Road, Farid Nagar, Supela Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh., 5 - Zahir Ahmed S/o Nazir Ahmed Aged About 73 Years R/o Eidgah Road, Farid Nagar, Supela Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh., 6 - Rahnuma@ Kushnuma W/o Mohd. Saleem Aged About 45 Years R/o Eidgah Road, Farid Nagar, Supela Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh., 7 - Mohd. Farid S/o Abdul Jabbar Aged About 43 Years R/o Gandhi Nagar, Kasarideeh, Durg, Tehsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh., ... Respondents For Appellant : None, despite repeated calls. For Respondents : Ms. Anushka Sharma, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri R.S.Marhas, Advocate. (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE RADHAKISHAN AGRAWAL) Order Sheet 31/01/2026 1. When the matter was called on 20.09.2023, none was present and even today, when the matter is called repeatedly, none appears for the 2 appellant nor any representation is made on his behalf. 2. In the above circumstance and in the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant, no other option is left out to this Court except to dismiss this appeal for non-prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) JUDGE Anjani