Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15909 (CHH)

SUKRITI SHUKLA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/301/2023 · 2026-01-28

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:4924-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 301 of 2023 Sukriti Shukla aged about 37 years, W/o Blue Ityam R/o Main Street, Cavan, Ireland. Wrongly mentioned in FIR as 19, Anandpuri, East Boring Canal Road, Krishnapuri, Patna, Bihar. --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Station House OfÏcer, P.S. - Mahila Thana, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Sonal Shukla Aged About 35 Years W/o Shri Vishrut Shukla R/o 38, Om Society, Sunder Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) CRMP No. 543 of 2023 1 - Ramesh Shukla Aged About 67 Years S/o Late Shri Krishnadutt Shukla R/o 19, Anandpuri, East Boring, Cannal Road, Patna (Bihar) 2 - Renuka Shukla Aged About 65 W/o Ramesh Shukla Years R/o 19, Anandpuri, East Boring Cannal Road, Patna (Bihar) ---Petitioner(s) Versus 2 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House OfÏcer, P.S. Mahila Thana, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Sonal Shukla Aged About 35 Years W/o Shri Vishrut Shukla R/o 38, Om Society, Sundar Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kashif Shakeel, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sourabh Sahu, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Atul Kumar Kesharwani, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 29/01/2026 1 Heard Mr. Kashif Shakeel, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s), Mr. Sourabh Sahu, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the respondent No. 1 as well as Mr. Atul Kumar Kesharwani, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2. 2 Cr.M.P. No. 301/2023 has been filed by the petitioner seeking for the following relief(s): “(i) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the records pertaining to the case of the petitioner. (ii) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass an appropriate order for quashing impugned FIR dated 07.06.2022 bearing Crime No. 112/2022 registered with Police Station Mahila thana, Raipur, Chhattisgarh (Respondent No.1) against the present petitioner, in the interest of justice. 3 (iii) That, any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the interest of justice, may kindly be awarded.” 3 In Cr.M.P. No. 543/2023, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): “(i) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the records pertaining to the case of the Petitioners. (ii) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass an appropriate order for quashing impugned FIR dated 07.06.202 bearing Crime No. 11/2022 registered with Police Station– Mahila Thana, Raipur, Chhattisgarh (Respondent No. 1) against the present petitioners, in the interest of justice. (iii) That, any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the interest of justice, may kindly be awarded.” 4 In Cr.M.P. No. 301/2023, Mr. Kashif Shakeel, learned counsel appears and though the Vakalatnama was filed by Mr. Shobhit Mishra, learned counsel,however, now he is representing the petitioner but he could not file his Vakalatnama as the petitioner-Sukriti Shukla is residing in Ireland. He further submits that since no charge sheet has been filed against the petitioner-Sukriti Shukla, this petition has virtually become infructuous. 5 Learned counsel appearing for other side do not controvert the above submission. 6 In view of the above, Cr.M.P. No. 301/2023 is dismissed as having become infructuous. 4 7 So far as Cr.M.P. No. 543/2023 is concerned, Mr. Kashif Shakeel, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that since charge- sheet has been filed against the petitioners-Ramesh Shukla and Renuka Shukla, on 24.05.2024, and charges have also been framed against them on 17.12.2025, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to challenge the charge sheet and framing of the charges against the petitioners. 8 Learned counsel appearing for other side have no objection. 9 In view of the above, Cr.M.P. No. 543/2023 is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to take recourse to law, if so advised. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Amit AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Date: 2026.01.30 11:21:14 +0530