1 ( 2026:HHC:29362 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.695 of 2026 Date of Decision: 17.07.2026 ___________________________________________________ Snow Creek Cottage ....Petitioner Versus Rajesh Agrawal and others …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India, with Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.3 & 4. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Compliance affidavit has been filed, wherein it has been stated that the Committee examined the application against the criteria and mandatory requirements set out in Clause 7.3 of the Scheme and observed that, in the absence of a budgetary allocation, the application could not be considered eligible for registration. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:29362 ) 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and, accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. Notice discharged. 3. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to seek avail appropriate remedy, as available to it under the law. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) July 17, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)